This is the way it goes in the U.S. Our beloved Constitution, true trustee of Americans' defining rights, has a second amendment giving Americans the right to own guns.
The second amendment to the U.S. Constitution states:
"A well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed."
Washington, D.C., also referred to as the District of Columbia, had a 32-year old gun law banning handguns which has now been reviewed by the U.S. Supreme Court. Would the D.C. ban stand, or does it conflict with the rights of Americans under the Constitution, the highest law in the land?
The Supreme Court decision: Americans have the right to own guns for self-defense and for hunting, and are not required to be in a "militia" in order to exercise their second amendment right to own guns. It's still one more 5-4 decision reflecting Republicans' appointment of Conservatives as Supreme Court Judges, appointed for life.
This brings consequences for crime statistics, child protection, police efforts, the NRA, and a cheering George W. Bush. Every nose will now be counted as having the right to carry a handgun.
I knew a fellow once in Texas, who surprised me during lunch one time. I'd asked if it were true, that most Texans have guns. He shifted his weight, reached into his waist pack, pockets, socks, and other parts I couldn't see over the restaurant table, indicating to me where he was carrying five < ! > guns at that moment. I couldn't have seen them.
He must be really happy today. It was like watching Denny Crane in "Boston Legal" being asked what he thinks of gun control. His answer, wordless, was to just pull out guns from pockets, waistband and socks, creating a small private arsenal right on his desk.
Justice John Paul Stevens dissented. He mocked the majority of five judges deciding the case, saying no evidence was found for what they'd like people to believe: that over 200 years ago, the original framers of the Constitution "made a choice to limit the tools available to elected officials wishing to regulate civilian uses of weapons."
Justice Stephen Breyer also dissented. He wrote, ""In my view, there simply is no untouchable constitutional right guaranteed by the Second Amendment to keep loaded handguns in the house in crime-ridden urban areas."
Who made this decision?
Chief Justice John Roberts, and Justices Scalia, Samuel Alito, Anthony Kennedy and Clarence Thomas.
Dissenters: Justices Stevens, Breyer, Ruth Bader Ginsburg and David Souter.
The Supreme Court wouldn't even let Washington, D.C. keep its current law requiring that firearms be equipped with trigger locks.
Denny Crane would be proud. (
NY Times story here).
CaroleBookmark/Search this post with: